Sharp v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

CourtUnited States Court of Federal Claims
DecidedApril 24, 2020
Docket17-628
StatusUnpublished

This text of Sharp v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Sharp v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Federal Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sharp v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2020).

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 17-628V (not to be published)

************************* CAMERON SHARP, * * * Chief Special Master Corcoran * Petitioner, * Filed: March 25, 2020 * v. * * Decision by Stipulation; Influenza Vaccine; SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Polyneuropathy. * Respondent. * * *************************

Amber D. Wilson, Maglio Christopher & Toale, P.A., Washington, D.C., for Petitioner.

Camille M. Collett, U.S. Dep’t of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

DECISION ON STIPULATION 1

On May 11, 2017, Cameron Sharp filed a petition seeking compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. 2 ECF No. 1. Petitioner alleged that he suffered from chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy as a result of the influenza vaccine he received on December 7, 2015. Id. at 1. In October 2017, the parties began exploring informal resolution of the case. See Resp’s Status Rep. at 1, filed Oct. 7, 2017 (ECF No. 15). Eventually the parties were able to agree to settle the case. While Respondent maintains that the influenza vaccine

1 Although this Decision has been formally designated “not to be published,” it will nevertheless be posted on the Court of Federal Claims’ website in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, 44 U.S.C. § 3501 (2012). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. As provided by 42 U.S.C. § 300aa- 12(d)(4)(B), however, the parties may object to the Decision’s inclusion of certain kinds of confidential information. Specifically, under Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party has fourteen days within which to request redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b). Otherwise, the whole Decision will be available online in its present form. Id. 2 The Vaccine Program comprises Part 2 of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3758, codified as amended at 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10 through 34 (2012) (“Vaccine Act” or “the Act”). did not cause Petitioner’s injury, the parties filed a stipulation on March 12, 2020. See Stip. at 1– 2 (ECF No. 50).

Based upon my own review of the record, I conclude that the parties’ stipulation (as attached hereto) is reasonable. I therefore adopt it as my decision in awarding damages on the terms set forth therein.

The stipulation awards:

• A lump sum of $189,072.65, in the form of a check payable to Petitioner; and • An amount sufficient to purchase an annuity contract as described in Paragraph 10 of the parties’ stipulation (as attached hereto).

Stip. at 2. This amount represents compensation for all damages under Section 15(a) of the Act to which Petitioner is entitled.

I approve a Vaccine Program award in the requested amount set forth above to be made to Petitioner. In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment herewith. 3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties may expedite entry of judgment by each filing (either jointly or separately) a notice renouncing their right to seek review.

2 Case 1:17-w-00628-UNJ Document 50 Filed 03/12/20 Page 1 of 7

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

) CAMERON SHARP, ) ) Petitioner, ) V. ) ) No. 17-628V SECRETARY OF HEALTH ) Chief Special Master Corcoran AND HUMAN SERVICES, ) ECF ) Respondent. )

STIPULATION

The parties hereby stipulate to the following matters:

1. Cameron Sharp, petitioner, filed a petition for vaccine compensation under the

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10 to -34 (the "Vaccine

Program"). The petition seeks compensation for injuries allegedly related to petitioner's receipt

of an influenza ("flu') vaccine, which vaccine is contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the

"Table"), 42 C.F.R. § 100.3 (a).

2. Petitioner received his flu vaccination on December 17, 2015.

3. The vaccination was administered within the United States.

4. Petitioner alleges that he suffered from chronic inflammatory demyelinating

polyneuropathy ("CIDP") as a result of receiving the flu vaccine, and that he experienced the

residual effects of this injury for more than six months.

5. Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action

for damages on his behalf as a result of his condition.

6. Respondent denies that the flu vaccine caused petitioner to suffer from CIDP or any Case 1:17-w-00628-UNJ Document 50 Filed 03/12/20 Page 2 of 7

other injury or his current condition.

7. Maintaining their above-stated positions, the parties nevertheless now agree that the

issues between them shall be settled and that a decision should be entered awarding the

compensation described in paragraph 8 of this Stipulation.

8. As soon as practicable after an entry of judgment reflecting a decision consistent with

the terms of this Stipulation, and after petitioner has filed an election to receive compensation

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(l), the Secretary of Health and Human Services will issue

the following vaccine compensation payments:

a. A lump sum of $189,072.65, which amount represents compensation for first year life care expenses ($5,000.00), pain and suffering ($171,000.00) and past unreimbursable expenses ($13,072.65) in the form of a check payable to petitioner; and

b. An amount sufficient to purchase the annuity contract described in paragraph 10 below, paid to the life insurance company from which the annuity will be purchased (the "Life Insurance Company").

These amounts represent compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. §300aa-15(a).

9. The Life Insurance Company must have a minimum of$250,000,000 capital and

surplus, exclusive of any mandatory security valuation reserve. The Life Insurance Company

must have one of the following ratings from two of the following rating organizations:

a. A.M. Best Company: A++, A+, A+g, A+p, A+r, or A+s;

b. Moody's Investor Service Claims Paying Rating: Aa3, Aa2, Aal, or Aaa;

c. Standard and Poor's Corporation Insurer Claims-Paying Ability Rating: AA-, AA, AA+, or AAA;

d. Fitch Credit Rating Company, Insurance Company Claims Paying Ability Rating: AA-, AA, AA+, or AAA.

10. The Secretary of Health and Human Services agrees to purchase an annuity contract

from the Life Insurance Company for the benefit of petitioner, Cameron Sharp, pursuant to

2 Case 1:17-w-00628-UNJ Document 50 Filed 03/12/20 Page 3 of 7

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 300aa-
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-
§ 300aa-10
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10
§ 300aa-15
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)
§ 300aa-21
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(l)
§ 300aa-2l
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-2l(a)(I)
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Sharp v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sharp-v-secretary-of-health-and-human-services-uscfc-2020.