Sharp v. Nesmith

40 S.C.L. 31
CourtCourt of Appeals of South Carolina
DecidedDecember 15, 1852
StatusPublished

This text of 40 S.C.L. 31 (Sharp v. Nesmith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sharp v. Nesmith, 40 S.C.L. 31 (S.C. Ct. App. 1852).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This Court concurs with the presiding Judge in his instructions to the Jury. Their verdict is entirely satisfactory. The motion is dismissed.

O’Neall, WaRdlaw, Frost, Withers and Whitner, JJ. concurred.

Motion dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
40 S.C.L. 31, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sharp-v-nesmith-scctapp-1852.