Sharp v. Montcalm Circuit Judge

107 N.W. 874, 144 Mich. 328, 1906 Mich. LEXIS 1052
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided May 24, 1906·No. Calendar No. 21,657·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The probate judge of Montcalm county made an order allowing relator’s annual guardianship account. An appeal was taken from that order to the circuit court for said county. Relator moved to dismiss on the ground that the appeal was taken by one who had no right to take it. Respondent denied this motion. Relator asks us to compel him to grant it by issuing a writ of mandamus.

It is obvious that relator (provided he does nothing that amounts to a waiver) may review the order complained of by writ of error after final judgment. It is settled by many recent decisions of this court (see Michigan Mut. Fire-Ins. Co. v. Wayne Circuit Judge, 112 Mich. 270; Cattermole v. Ionia Circuit Judge, 136 Mich. 274; Roberts v. Lenawee Circuit Judge, 140 Mich. 115; Chatfield v. Lenawee Circuit Judge, 140 Mich. 636) that he must content himself with that method of review, and is not entitled to a writ of mandamus.

Mandamus denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sharp v. Montcalm Circuit Judge, 107 N.W. 874, 144 Mich. 328, 1906 Mich. LEXIS 1052 (Mich. 1906).

107 N.W. 874 (Sharp v. Montcalm Circuit Judge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hamilton Carhartt Cotton Mills v. Wayne Circuit Judge
203 N.W. 836 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1925)
Mikkola v. Houghton Circuit Judge
130 N.W. 1118 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1911)
Olds Motor Works v. Wayne Circuit Judge
129 N.W. 710 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1911)
Tarsney v. Wayne Circuit Judge
116 N.W. 465 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1908)
Geddis v. Wayne Circuit Judge
114 N.W. 874 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1908)
Peninsular Club of Grand Rapids v. Kent Circuit Judge
114 N.W. 396 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1908)
City of Flint v. Genesee Circuit Judge
109 N.W. 769 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1906)