Sharp v. Dusenbury
1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 134, 1 Cole. Cas. 134, 2 Johns. Cas. 117
This text of 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 134 (Sharp v. Dusenbury) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Sharp v. Dusenbury, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 134, 1 Cole. Cas. 134, 2 Johns. Cas. 117 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1800).
Opinion
When parties agree to submit a controversy to the decision of the sheriff, the inquest is to be considered as in nature of an arbitration, and therefore, the court will never set aside the inquisition merely because the sheriff admits improper or rejects proper evidence.
Motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Weber v. International Railway Co.
57 Misc. 157 (New York Supreme Court, 1907)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 134, 1 Cole. Cas. 134, 2 Johns. Cas. 117, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sharp-v-dusenbury-nysupct-1800.