Sharp v. Dusenbury

1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 134, 1 Cole. Cas. 134, 2 Johns. Cas. 117
New York Supreme Court·Decided October 15, 1800·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

When parties agree to submit a controversy to the decision of the sheriff, the inquest is to be considered as in nature of an arbitration, and therefore, the court will never set aside the inquisition merely because the sheriff admits improper or rejects proper evidence.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sharp v. Dusenbury, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 134, 1 Cole. Cas. 134, 2 Johns. Cas. 117 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1800).

1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 134 (Sharp v. Dusenbury) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Weber v. International Railway Co.
57 Misc. 157 (New York Supreme Court, 1907)