Sharp v. Dalton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sharp v. Dalton

224 A.D. 663

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1928·Published

Opinion

Order granting injunction pendente lite reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Upon the record presented, we are of opinion that the ordinance was valid in its adoption, both as to procedure (People ex rel. Locke v. The Common Council of the City of Rochester, 5 Lans. 11), and as to the exercise of the police power. Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Young, Kapper and Scudder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order granting injunction pendente lite reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Upon the record presented, we are of opinion that the ordinance was valid in its adoption, both as to procedure (People ex rel. Locke v. The Common Council of the City of Rochester, 5 Lans. 11), and as to the exercise of the police power. Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Young, Kapper and Scudder, JJ., concur.

Sharp v. Dalton, 224 A.D. 663 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1928).

Pincite

224 A.D. 663 (Sharp v. Dalton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related