Sharp v. Burson

77 S.E. 1126, 139 Ga. 692, 1913 Ga. LEXIS 569
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedApril 17, 1913
StatusPublished

This text of 77 S.E. 1126 (Sharp v. Burson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sharp v. Burson, 77 S.E. 1126, 139 Ga. 692, 1913 Ga. LEXIS 569 (Ga. 1913).

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

1. Considered in the light of the evidence and entire charge, there was no merit in any of the grounds of the amended motion for new trial, which complained: (a) that the verdict was contrary to certain portions of the charge; (6) that after charging as specifically requested, the judge erroneously qualified the charge; (o) that, though not requested in writing, the judge omitted to charge in certain respects.

2. Under application of the principles announced in the decision of this case.when it was before this court on a former occasion (Burson v. Stone & Co., 135 Ga. 115, 68 S. E. 1038), the evidence was sufficient to support the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Burson v. Stone & Co.
68 S.E. 1038 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1910)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
77 S.E. 1126, 139 Ga. 692, 1913 Ga. LEXIS 569, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sharp-v-burson-ga-1913.