Sharp v. Borough of Vineland
194 A. 260, 118 N.J.L. 567, 1937 N.J. LEXIS 323
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Case in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Donges, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Cole, JJ. 9.
For reversal — Bodine, Heher, Rafferty, JJ. 3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sharp v. Borough of Vineland, 194 A. 260, 118 N.J.L. 567, 1937 N.J. LEXIS 323 (N.J. 1937).
194 A. 260 (Sharp v. Borough of Vineland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Nation v. Esperdy
239 F. Supp. 531 (S.D. New York, 1965)
Smith v. National Tank Company
350 P.2d 539 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1960)