Sharp v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

420 P.3d 698, 292 Or. App. 556
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided June 27, 2018·No. A166071·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

*557Under ORS 183.400, petitioner challenges OAR 255-035-0022, a rule adopted by the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (the board), asserting that the rule is inconsistent with the board's statutory authority. See ORS 183.400(4) (court shall declare a rule invalid only if the rule violates constitutional provision, exceeds the statutory authority of the agency that adopted the rule, or was adopted without compliance with applicable rulemaking procedures). Having reviewed the parties' arguments, we reject petitioner's contentions and conclude that the challenged rule is valid.

OAR 255-035-0022 held valid.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sharp v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision, 420 P.3d 698, 292 Or. App. 556 (Or. Ct. App. 2018).

420 P.3d 698 (Sharp v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 183.400
Oregon § 183.400