Sharp v. Arledge

Court of Appeals of Texas

Sharp v. Arledge

1 White & W. 338

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedJanuary 18, 1877

DocketNo. 42, Tex. L. J., vol. 1, p. 79

StatusPublished

This text of 1 White & W. 338 (Sharp v. Arledge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sharp v. Arledge, 1 White & W. 338 (Tex. Ct. App. 1877).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

White, J.

§ 632. Oath in forma pauperis on error. The plaintiff in error did not execute a bond, but made an affidavit in these words: “That he is unable to give bond forsupersedeas, as required by law. That he has tried to give such bond and failed.” This affidavit is not in compliance with or in conformity to the provisions of the stat[339]*339ute regulating appeals and writs of error in cases where the party is unable to give bond. [Pas. Dig. art. 6180; and see also the case of Green v. Martin, 43 Tex. 653.]

January 18, 1877.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

White, J.

§ 632. Oath in forma pauperis on error. The plaintiff in error did not execute a bond, but made an affidavit in these words: “That he is unable to give bond forsupersedeas, as required by law. That he has tried to give such bond and failed.” This affidavit is not in compliance with or in conformity to the provisions of the stat[339]*339ute regulating appeals and writs of error in cases where the party is unable to give bond. [Pas. Dig. art. 6180; and see also the case of Green v. Martin, 43 Tex. 653.]

January 18, 1877.

Dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 White & W. 338, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sharp-v-arledge-texapp-1877.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack