Sharondale Realty, Inc. v. Anglers Motel & Boat Docks, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Sharondale Realty, Inc. v. Anglers Motel & Boat Docks, Inc.

545 So. 2d 917, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2383, 1989 WL 45404

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 3, 1989·No. No. 88-01671·Published

Opinion

LEHAN, Judge.

We affirm the final judgment entered against appellant real estate broker in its suit for a commission under a contract giving it the exclusive right to sell certain real estate. There was evidence from which the jury could have found that through mutual mistake the written contract failed to express the intent of the parties that the sale on the basis of which the broker seeks a commission was excluded from the contract. See Providence Square Ass’n v. Biancardi, 507 So.2d 1366, 1369 (Fla.1987); Bagnasco v. Smith, 382 So.2d 401 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980).

Affirmed.

SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and PARKER, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LEHAN, Judge.

We affirm the final judgment entered against appellant real estate broker in its suit for a commission under a contract giving it the exclusive right to sell certain real estate. There was evidence from which the jury could have found that through mutual mistake the written contract failed to express the intent of the parties that the sale on the basis of which the broker seeks a commission was excluded from the contract. See Providence Square Ass’n v. Biancardi, 507 So.2d 1366, 1369 (Fla.1987); Bagnasco v. Smith, 382 So.2d 401 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980).

Affirmed.

SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and PARKER, J., concur.

Sharondale Realty, Inc. v. Anglers Motel & Boat Docks, Inc., 545 So. 2d 917, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2383, 1989 WL 45404 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

545 So. 2d 917 (Sharondale Realty, Inc. v. Anglers Motel & Boat Docks, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related