Sharon Sandusky v. Sodexho Sandusky, Paul Kelly, Tom Hincher, Anne Ortiz

Third Circuit

Sharon Sandusky v. Sodexho Sandusky, Paul Kelly, Tom Hincher, Anne Ortiz

61 F.3d 896, 1995 WL 406951

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedJune 9, 1995

Docket94-5655

StatusPublished

This text of 61 F.3d 896 (Sharon Sandusky v. Sodexho Sandusky, Paul Kelly, Tom Hincher, Anne Ortiz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sharon Sandusky v. Sodexho Sandusky, Paul Kelly, Tom Hincher, Anne Ortiz, 61 F.3d 896, 1995 WL 406951 (3d Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

61 F.3d 896

Sharon Sandusky
v.
Sodexho Sandusky, Paul Kelly, Tom Hincher, Anne Ortiz

NO. 94-5655

United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.

June 09, 1995

Appeal From: D.N.J., No. 94-cv-00615

AFFIRMED.

Federal Reporter. The Third Circuit provides by rule for the reporting of opinions having 'precedential or institutional value. An opinion which appears to have value only to the trial court or the parties is ordinarily not published.' The Federal Reporter tables are prepared from lists of cases terminated by judgment orders, unpublished per curiam opinions and unpublished signed opinions, indicating the disposition of each case, transmitted by the Court. Third Circuit Rules, App. 1, Internal Operating Procedures, Ch. 5, sec. 5.1, 28 U.S.C.A.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

61 F.3d 896

Sharon Sandusky
v.
Sodexho Sandusky, Paul Kelly, Tom Hincher, Anne Ortiz

NO. 94-5655

United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.

June 09, 1995

Appeal From: D.N.J., No. 94-cv-00615

AFFIRMED.

Federal Reporter. The Third Circuit provides by rule for the reporting of opinions having 'precedential or institutional value. An opinion which appears to have value only to the trial court or the parties is ordinarily not published.' The Federal Reporter tables are prepared from lists of cases terminated by judgment orders, unpublished per curiam opinions and unpublished signed opinions, indicating the disposition of each case, transmitted by the Court. Third Circuit Rules, App. 1, Internal Operating Procedures, Ch. 5, sec. 5.1, 28 U.S.C.A.)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

61 F.3d 896, 1995 WL 406951, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sharon-sandusky-v-sodexho-sandusky-paul-kelly-tom--ca3-1995.