Sharon Rose Zlatkin v. William Roggow
Opinion
Court of Appeals, State of Michigan
ORDER
Mark T. Boonstra
Sharon Rose Zlatkin v William Roggow Presiding Judge
Docket No. 346247 Michael J. Riordan
LC No. 17-009273-NZ James Robert Redford Judges
The Court orders that the motion by defendant-appellee Maveal seeking textual correction is GRANTED. The Court’s opinion issued March 19, 2020 is hereby AMENDED. The first sentence in footnote 7 has been corrected from stating “the lack” to “the existence”.
In all other respects, the March 19, 2020 opinion remains unchanged.
Presiding Judge
April 2, 2020
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sharon Rose Zlatkin v. William Roggow (Sharon Rose Zlatkin v. William Roggow) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.