Sharon Peebles v. Kathyrn Dietrich

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided February 3, 2011·No. 14-10-01137-CV·Published

Opinion

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed February 3, 2011.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-10-01137-CV

____________

SHARON PEEBLES, Appellant

V.

KATHRYN DIETRICH, Appellee

On Appeal from the 309th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2005-40129

MEMORANDUM  OPINION

This is an attempted appeal from an order signed October 7, 2010.  The clerk’s record was filed January 11, 2011.  The record before this court contains no appealable order. The validity of a contempt judgment is not appealable and can be attacked only collaterally by writ of habeas corpus.  See Ex parte Williams, 690 S.W.2d 243, 243 n. 1 (Tex. 1985).[1]

            On January 12, 2011, notification was transmitted to the parties of this court’s intention to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction unless appellant filed a response demonstrating grounds for continuing the appeal on or before January 24, 2011.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a).  Appellant’s response fails to demonstrate that this court has jurisdiction over the appeal.

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Brown, Boyce, and Jamison.



[1] Appellant attacked the contempt order by writ of habeas corpus, which this court denied.  See Ex parte Peebles, No. 14-10-00973-CV, 2010 WL 4892634 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Dec. 2, 2010, orig. proceeding) (memo. op.).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sharon Peebles v. Kathyrn Dietrich, (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

Sharon Peebles v. Kathyrn Dietrich (Sharon Peebles v. Kathyrn Dietrich) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ex Parte Williams
690 S.W.2d 243 (Texas Supreme Court, 1985)