Sharon Peebles v. Kathyrn Dietrich
This text of Sharon Peebles v. Kathyrn Dietrich (Sharon Peebles v. Kathyrn Dietrich) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed February 3, 2011.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-10-01137-CV
SHARON PEEBLES, Appellant
V.
KATHRYN DIETRICH, Appellee
On Appeal from the 309th District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 2005-40129
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This is an attempted appeal from an order signed October 7, 2010. The clerk’s record was filed January 11, 2011. The record before this court contains no appealable order. The validity of a contempt judgment is not appealable and can be attacked only collaterally by writ of habeas corpus. See Ex parte Williams, 690 S.W.2d 243, 243 n. 1 (Tex. 1985).[1]
On January 12, 2011, notification was transmitted to the parties of this court’s intention to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction unless appellant filed a response demonstrating grounds for continuing the appeal on or before January 24, 2011. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a). Appellant’s response fails to demonstrate that this court has jurisdiction over the appeal.
Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Brown, Boyce, and Jamison.
[1] Appellant attacked the contempt order by writ of habeas corpus, which this court denied. See Ex parte Peebles, No. 14-10-00973-CV, 2010 WL 4892634 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Dec. 2, 2010, orig. proceeding) (memo. op.).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Sharon Peebles v. Kathyrn Dietrich, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sharon-peebles-v-kathyrn-dietrich-texapp-2011.