SHARON MOORE BODE v. WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB, etc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 6, 2021·No. 20-0662·Published

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed October 6, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D20-662 Lower Tribunal No. 15-26463 ________________

Sharon Moore Bode, et al., Appellants,

vs.

Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, etc., Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Barbara Areces, Judge.

David J. Winker, P.A., and David J. Winker, for appellants.

Lender Legal PLLC, and Danielle N. Waters (Orlando), for appellee.

Before LINDSEY, HENDON and BOKOR, JJ.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. IndyMac Fed. Bank FSB v. Hagan, 104 So. 3d 1232, 1236

(Fla. 3rd DCA 2012) (“Florida case law is clear that the substance of an

objection to a foreclosure sale under section 45.031(5) must be directed

toward conduct that occurred at, or which related to, the foreclosure sale

itself.”).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SHARON MOORE BODE v. WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB, etc., (Fla. Ct. App. 2021).

SHARON MOORE BODE v. WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB, etc. (SHARON MOORE BODE v. WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB, etc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Indymac Federal Bank FSB v. Hagan
104 So. 3d 1232 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)