Sharon Meeks v. Department of Human Services

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided July 24, 2018·No. 17-2931·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

No. 17-2931

Sharon L. Meeks

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

Department of Human Services

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee

Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock

Submitted: July 19, 2018

Filed: July 24, 2018

[Unpublished]

Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Sharon Meeks appeals from the order of the District Court1 granting summary judgment to her former employer the Arkansas Department of Human Services in her

1 The Honorable Kristine G. Baker, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

Title VII retaliation action. After de novo review, we conclude that the District Court did not err. See Hutton v. Maynard, 812 F.3d 679, 683–84 (8th Cir. 2016) (setting forth the evidence necessary to survive a motion for summary judgment on a Title VII retaliation claim); see also Conolly v. Clark, 457 F.3d 872, 876 (8th Cir. 2006) (“[A] properly supported motion for summary judgment is not defeated by self-serving affidavits.”).

We affirm the judgment of the District Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sharon Meeks v. Department of Human Services, (8th Cir. 2018).

Sharon Meeks v. Department of Human Services (Sharon Meeks v. Department of Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kelly Conolly v. James D. Clark
457 F.3d 872 (Eighth Circuit, 2006)
Herman Hutton v. Danny Maynard, Sr.
812 F.3d 679 (Eighth Circuit, 2016)