Sharon Lee Hanson v. Guy Robb Cowen
This text of Sharon Lee Hanson v. Guy Robb Cowen (Sharon Lee Hanson v. Guy Robb Cowen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ACCEPTED 03-14-00574-CV 3697905 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 1/8/2015 1:35:47 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE CAUSE NO. 03-14-00574-CV CLERK
SHARON LEE HANSON § THIRD DISTRICT § FILED IN V. § COURT OF APPEALS OF TEXAS 3rd COURT OF APPEALS § AUSTIN, TEXAS GUY ROBB COWEN § IN AUSTIN, TEXAS1/8/2015 1:35:47 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk APPELLEE'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE APPELLEE'S BRIEF WITH CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE
TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF THIS COURT:
COMES NOW GUY ROBB COWEN, APPELLANT-MOVANT, herein and files his
Motion for Extension of Time to File Appellee's Brief, pursuant to Local Rules 47 and 52 and
Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 10.1 and 10.5(b)(1), and in support thereof shows the
following:
I. BACKGROUND AND BASIS FOR EXTENSION
Briefly, by way of background, the undersigned counsel was served Appellant's brief on
or about December 10, 2014, making the Appellee's brief on this same day. Despite efforts to
complete the brief over the holidays, Appellee cannot meet the deadline effectively. No previous
extensions have been requested by Appellee. The undersigned counsel, aside from having a trial
practice, is currently working on a total of five (5) briefs with two (2) of those being Petitions for
Certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court from the US Court of Appeals in the 10 th and 5th Circuits.
The undersigned counsel is a solo practitioner. Additionally, it appears that the record may need
to be supplemented with a hearing transcript that has not been provided to the Court, at this time,
and which is material and relevant to the claims raised by Appellant in her brief. The undersigned
counsel seeks a thirty (30) day extension to allow her to assure there is a complete record before
the Court and adequate time to address all matters thoroughly.
1 II. GOOD CAUSE AND NOT FOR DELAY
The Motion is not filed due to Movant's actions or omissions of any kind. Moreover, the
motion is not sought for delay and is in the interest of justice and to honor this country’s
constitutional mandates to the right to effective assistance of counsel and due process.
WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, the undersigned counsel prays that
Appellee-Movant be granted an extension of time to file his brief in the proceeding herein.
Respectfully submitted,
By:___/s/__Marie E. Galindo_______ MARIE E. GALINDO Attorney at Law 639 Heights Boulevard Houston, Texas 77009 Telephone No. 713.299.1510 Facsimile No. 713.651.0776 State Bar No. 00796592
ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE- MOVANT
Certificate of Service
On JANUARY 8, 2015, a copy of the above-referenced pleading was sent via email to
Mr. Richard Mock, Appellant's counsel, and his assistant.
__/s/_Marie E. Galindo___________ MARIE E. GALINDO
Certificate of Conference
On this same day, the undersigned counsel's office left a message and sent an email
asking Mr. Mock about his position as to the filing of this request and explained the basis of said
request. Mr. Mock has emailed that he does not oppose said motion.
_/s/_Marie E. Galindo__________________ MARIE E. GALINDO
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Sharon Lee Hanson v. Guy Robb Cowen, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sharon-lee-hanson-v-guy-robb-cowen-texapp-2015.