Sharon Kay Magnusson v. Florida Department of Revenue

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 9, 2017
Docket15-0120
StatusPublished

This text of Sharon Kay Magnusson v. Florida Department of Revenue (Sharon Kay Magnusson v. Florida Department of Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sharon Kay Magnusson v. Florida Department of Revenue, (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

SHARON KAY MAGNUSSON, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Appellant, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

v. CASE NO. 1D15-120

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE and MARILYN BRETT-SHEFFIELD,

Appellees.

_____________________________/

Opinion filed August 10, 2017.

An appeal from a Final Order of the Department of Revenue.

Sharon Kay Magnusson, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Toni C. Bernstein, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee Department of Revenue.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. *

WINOKUR, JAY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., CONCUR.

* We reject the concession of the Department of Revenue (“DOR”) that its final administrative support order must be vacated because it was entered without jurisdiction. The Administrative Law Judge relinquished jurisdiction in the case to DOR on December 12, 2014, not on December 16, 2014, as DOR claims in its brief. Accordingly, DOR did have jurisdiction to enter the December 15, 2014, final administrative support order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Sharon Kay Magnusson v. Florida Department of Revenue, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sharon-kay-magnusson-v-florida-department-of-revenue-fladistctapp-2017.