Sharon Elaine Loyd, Appellant/Cross-Appellee v. David Mark Loyd, Appellee/Cross-Appellant

Court of Appeals of Texas

Sharon Elaine Loyd, Appellant/Cross-Appellee v. David Mark Loyd, Appellee/Cross-Appellant

DecidedNovember 30, 2007

Docket12-07-00292-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Sharon Elaine Loyd, Appellant/Cross-Appellee v. David Mark Loyd, Appellee/Cross-Appellant (Sharon Elaine Loyd, Appellant/Cross-Appellee v. David Mark Loyd, Appellee/Cross-Appellant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sharon Elaine Loyd, Appellant/Cross-Appellee v. David Mark Loyd, Appellee/Cross-Appellant, (Tex. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM HEADING

NO. 12-07-00292-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

SHARON ELAINE LOYD, § APPEAL FROM THE

APPELLANT

V. § COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF

DAVID MARK LOYD,

APPELLEE § SMITH , TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

This appeal is being dismissed because Appellant has failed, after notice, to pay or make arrangements to pay the trial court clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s record. The trial court’s judgment was signed on July 2, 2007. After extension of time, the clerk’s record was due on November 20, 2007. On November 8, 2007, the trial court clerk filed a motion for extension of time to file the clerk’s record, stating that the reason for the delay in filing was that Appellant had not made a claim of indigence and had failed to either pay or make arrangements to pay for the preparing of the clerk’s record. On November 9, 2007, this court informed Appellant that, pursuant to rules of appellate procedure 37.3(b) and 42.3(c), the appeal would be dismissed unless proof of full payment to the clerk was provided on or before November 19, 2007.

The deadline has now passed, and Appellant has neither provided proof of full payment or otherwise responded to this court’s notice. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b); 42.3(c).

Opinion delivered November 30, 2007.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(PUBLISH)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM HEADING

NO. 12-07-00292-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

SHARON ELAINE LOYD, § APPEAL FROM THE

APPELLANT

V. § COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF

DAVID MARK LOYD,

APPELLEE § SMITH , TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

This appeal is being dismissed because Appellant has failed, after notice, to pay or make arrangements to pay the trial court clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s record. The trial court’s judgment was signed on July 2, 2007. After extension of time, the clerk’s record was due on November 20, 2007. On November 8, 2007, the trial court clerk filed a motion for extension of time to file the clerk’s record, stating that the reason for the delay in filing was that Appellant had not made a claim of indigence and had failed to either pay or make arrangements to pay for the preparing of the clerk’s record. On November 9, 2007, this court informed Appellant that, pursuant to rules of appellate procedure 37.3(b) and 42.3(c), the appeal would be dismissed unless proof of full payment to the clerk was provided on or before November 19, 2007.

The deadline has now passed, and Appellant has neither provided proof of full payment or otherwise responded to this court’s notice. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b); 42.3(c).

Opinion delivered November 30, 2007.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(PUBLISH)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Sharon Elaine Loyd, Appellant/Cross-Appellee v. David Mark Loyd, Appellee/Cross-Appellant, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sharon-elaine-loyd-appellantcross-appellee-v-david-texapp-2007.