Sharon Dooley v. Najarian Holdings, LLC

• Court: Court of Appeals of Georgia
• Decided: July 23, 2015
• Docket: A15D0511
• Status: Published

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA,____________________ July 22, 2015

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15D0511. SHARON DOOLEY v. NAJARIAN HOLDINGS, LLC.

This case began as a dispossessory proceeding in magistrate court. Following an adverse ruling, defendant Sharon Dooley appealed to the superior court. The trial court issued an order on July 7, 2015 granting Najarian Holdings a writ of possession. Dooley filed this application for discretionary appeal on July 21, 2015.1 We lack jurisdiction.

Generally, an application for discretionary appeal may be filed within 30 days of entry of the order sought to be appealed. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (d). However, the underlying subject matter of an appeal controls over the relief sought in determining the proper appellate procedure. See Rebich v. Miles, 264 Ga. 467, 467-468 (448 SE2d 192) (1994). The underlying subject matter here is a dispossessory judgment. Under OCGA § 44-7-56, an appeal from a dispossessory judgment must be filed within seven days of the date the judgment was entered. See Ray M. Wright, Inc. v. Jones, 239 Ga. App. 521, 522-523 (521 SE2d 456) (1999). Dooley’s application, filed 14 days after the trial court issued its order, is untimely. Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction to review this application, which is hereby DISMISSED. Dooley’s emergency motion to stay eviction is hereby DENIED as MOOT. Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia 07/22/2015 Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

1 Dooley also filed a notice of appeal on July 9, 2015. However, it is well- established that “appeals from decisions of the superior courts reviewing decisions of lower courts by certiorari or de novo proceedings shall be by application for discretionary appeal.” (Punctuation omitted.) Bullock v. Sand, 260 Ga. App. 874, 875 (581 SE2d 333) (2003); see also OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1).