Sharon D. Lewis v. Ah4r1 Tx Dfw, Llc

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided December 31, 2013·No. 05-13-01058-CV·Published

Opinion

DISMISS; and Opinion Filed December 31, 2013.

S In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-01058-CV

SHARON D. LEWIS AND ALL OTHER OCCUPANTS OF 608 MULBERRY LANE, DESOTO, TEXAS 75115, Appellants V.

AH4R1 TX DFW, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3 Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-13-01305-C

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices O’Neill, Myers, and Brown Opinion by Justice O’Neill In a letter dated December 10, 2013, the Court questioned its jurisdiction over this appeal

in a forcible detainer action. Specifically, it appears the appeal is moot because appellee now has

possession of the property. We instructed appellants to file, within ten days, a letter brief

explaining how this Court has jurisdiction. We cautioned appellants that failure to file a letter

brief within the time requested would result in dismissal of the appeal without further notice. As

of today’s date, appellants have not filed a jurisdictional brief.

A case becomes moot if, at any stage during the proceedings, a controversy ceases to

exist between the parties. See Williams v. Lara, 52 S.W.3d 171, 184 (Tex. 2001). The purpose

of a forcible detainer action is to obtain immediate possession of property. See Scott v. Hewitt,

127 Tex. 31, 35, 90 S.W.2d 816, 818-19 (1936). A judgment of possession in a forcible detainer

action determines the right to immediate possession and is not intended to be a final

determination of whether the eviction is wrongful. See Marshall v. Housing Auth. of the City of

San Antonio, 198 S.W.3d 782, 787 (Tex. 2006).

In their unopposed motion to release the funds held as bond, 1 appellants informed the

Court that appellee is now in possession of the property. The issue of possession is no longer in

controversy. Accordingly we dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a).

/Michael J. O'Neill/ MICHAEL J. O’NEILL JUSTICE

131058F.P05

1 In an order dated August 19, 2013, the Court granted appellants’ unopposed motion.

S

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

SHARON D. LEWIS AND ALL OTHER On Appeal from the County Court OCCUPANTS OF 608 MULBERRY at Law No. 3, Dallas County, Texas. LANE, DESOTO, TEXAS 75115, Trial Court Cause No. CC-13-01305-C. Appellants Opinion delivered by Justice O’Neill.

Justices Myers and Brown, participating.

No. 05-13-01058-CV V.

AH4R1 TX DFW, LLC, Appellee

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED.

It is ORDERED that appellee, AH4R1 TX DFW, LLC, recover its costs of this appeal from appellants, SHARON D. LEWIS AND ALL OTHER OCCUPANTS OF 608 MULBERRY LANE, DESOTO, TEXAS 75115.

Judgment entered this 31st day of December, 2013.

/Michael J. O'Neill/ MICHAEL J. O'NEILL JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sharon D. Lewis v. Ah4r1 Tx Dfw, Llc, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Sharon D. Lewis v. Ah4r1 Tx Dfw, Llc (Sharon D. Lewis v. Ah4r1 Tx Dfw, Llc) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Marshall v. Housing Authority of San Antonio
198 S.W.3d 782 (Texas Supreme Court, 2006)
Williams v. Lara
52 S.W.3d 171 (Texas Supreme Court, 2001)
Scott Et Ux. v. Hewitt
90 S.W.2d 816 (Texas Supreme Court, 1936)