Sharon Boothe v. Michael J. Astrue

Eighth Circuit

Sharon Boothe v. Michael J. Astrue

360 F. App'x 711

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 15, 2010

Docket09-1546

StatusUnpublished

This text of 360 F. App'x 711 (Sharon Boothe v. Michael J. Astrue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sharon Boothe v. Michael J. Astrue, 360 F. App'x 711 (8th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

*712 PER CURIAM.

Sharon K. Boothe appeals the district court’s 2 order affirming the denial of disability insurance benefits for the period from July 15, 2000 until December 31, 2002. See Boothe v. Astrue, No. 08-5007, 2009 WL 117565 (W.D.Ark. Jan. 16, 2009). Having conducted a de novo review of the relevant record and considered Boothe’s arguments for reversal, see Davidson v. Astrue, 578 F.3d 888, 841-42 (8th Cir.2009) (standard of review), the court agrees with the district court that substantial evidence in the whole record supports the administrative law judge’s decision, and no error of law appears. The judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

2

. The Honorable James M. Marschewski, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas, sitting with the consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*712 PER CURIAM.

Sharon K. Boothe appeals the district court’s 2 order affirming the denial of disability insurance benefits for the period from July 15, 2000 until December 31, 2002. See Boothe v. Astrue, No. 08-5007, 2009 WL 117565 (W.D.Ark. Jan. 16, 2009). Having conducted a de novo review of the relevant record and considered Boothe’s arguments for reversal, see Davidson v. Astrue, 578 F.3d 888, 841-42 (8th Cir.2009) (standard of review), the court agrees with the district court that substantial evidence in the whole record supports the administrative law judge’s decision, and no error of law appears. The judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

2

. The Honorable James M. Marschewski, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas, sitting with the consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

360 F. App'x 711, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sharon-boothe-v-michael-j-astrue-ca8-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack