Sharon Boothe v. Michael J. Astrue

360 F. App'x 711
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided January 15, 2010·No. 09-1546·Unpublished

Opinion

*712 PER CURIAM.

Sharon K. Boothe appeals the district court’s 2 order affirming the denial of disability insurance benefits for the period from July 15, 2000 until December 31, 2002. See Boothe v. Astrue, No. 08-5007, 2009 WL 117565 (W.D.Ark. Jan. 16, 2009). Having conducted a de novo review of the relevant record and considered Boothe’s arguments for reversal, see Davidson v. Astrue, 578 F.3d 888, 841-42 (8th Cir.2009) (standard of review), the court agrees with the district court that substantial evidence in the whole record supports the administrative law judge’s decision, and no error of law appears. The judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

2

. The Honorable James M. Marschewski, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas, sitting with the consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sharon Boothe v. Michael J. Astrue, 360 F. App'x 711 (8th Cir. 2010).

360 F. App'x 711 (Sharon Boothe v. Michael J. Astrue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McPhetridge v. IBEW, Local Union No. 53
578 F.3d 886 (Eighth Circuit, 2009)