Sharon Bayus, Individually and Derivatively on Behalf of Innovative Alternatives, Inc. v. Dennis Stetzel, Individually Amber Cyr, Individually Stacy Dickerson, Individually, Sean Armistead, Individually and Constance Austin, Individually

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: August 26, 2025
• Docket: 01-25-00320-CV
• Status: Published

Opinion

Opinion issued August 26, 2025

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-25-00320-CV ——————————— SHARON BAYUS, INDIVIDUALLY AND DERIVATIVELY ON BEHALF OF INNOVATIVE ALTERNATIVES, INC., Appellant V. DENNIS STETZEL, AMBER CYR, STACY DICKSON, SEAN ARMISTEAD, AND CONSTANCE AUSTIN, Appellees

On Appeal from the 80th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2024-30979

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Sharon Bayus, individually and derivatively on behalf of

Innovative Alternatives, Inc., filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s April 19,

2025 final judgment. On August 19, 2025, appellant filed a “Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss Appeal.” In her motion, appellant stated that she “desire[d] to dismiss the

foregoing appeal.” Appellant therefore requested that the Court dismiss the appeal.

See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1) (permitting voluntary dismissal of appeal on motion

of appellant).

No other party has filed a notice of appeal, and no opinion has issued. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), (c). Appellant’s motion includes a certificate of

conference stating that appellees, Dennis Stetzel, Amber Cyr, Stacy Dickson, Sean

Armistead, and Constance Austin, are unopposed to the relief requested in the

motion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.1(a)(5), 10.3(a)(2).

Accordingly, the Court grants appellant’s motion and dismisses the appeal.

See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f). We dismiss all other pending motions as

moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Guerra, Gunn, and Dokupil.