Sharma Vs. Patel

CourtNevada Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 15, 2019
Docket79070
StatusPublished

This text of Sharma Vs. Patel (Sharma Vs. Patel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sharma Vs. Patel, (Neb. 2019).

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

VISHAL SHARMA, No. 79070 Appellant, VS. CHIRAYU PATEL, FILED Respondent. OCT 5 2019 EUZABEI A. BROWN CLERK OF SUPREME COURT BY • 1/4/ DEPUqC - 1-.ERI

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This is an appeal from a district court order denying a motion for reconsideration and denying a motion to strike. Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County; Connie J. Steinheimer, Judge. Appellant filed a complaint for "other tort and unjust enrichment" against respondent. Respondent filed a motion to dismiss or, alternatively, a motion to stay the case pending arbitration in a related matter filed in federal court in Connecticut. The district court entered an order denying the motion to dismiss and granting the motion for stay. Appellant then filed a motion for reconsideration of the district court's order. The district court denied the motion for reconsideration and denied respondent's motion to strike appellant's requests for submission. Appellant appeals from the order denying reconsideration and motion to strike. Initial review of the docketing statement and documents before this court reveals a jurisdictional defect. This court has jurisdiction to consider an appeal only when the appeal is authorized by statute or court rule. Taylor Constr. Co. v. Hilton Hotels, 100 Nev.. 207, 678 P.2d 1152 (1984). No statute or court rule allows for an appeal from the order SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

1947A .03. - 250) challenged by appellant in this appeal. See Consolidated Generator-Nev., Inc. v. Cummins Engine Co., 114 Nev. 1304, 971 P.2d 1251 (1998) (indicating that interlocutory orders are not appealable unless specially authorized by rule or statute, but may be considered in the context of an appeal from the final judgment); Lee v. GNLV Corp., 116 Nev. 424, 996 P.2d 416 (2000) (defining a final judgment); Brunzell Constr. Co. v. Harrah's Club, 81 Nev. 414, 404 P.2d 902 (1965) (an order granting a stay of proceedings is not appealable). Accordingly, as it appears that this court lacks jurisdiction, it ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

J.

• !,

, J. Parraguirre Cadish

cc: Hon. Connie J. Steinheimer, District Judge Vishal Sharma Maupin, Cox & LeGoy Washoe District Court Clerk

SUPREME Gown- OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A Ae§:ca

• nfai F Est 10

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

BRUNZELL CONSTR. CO., INC. v. Harrah's Club
404 P.2d 902 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1965)
TAYLOR CONSTRUCTION CO. v. Hilton Hotels Corp.
678 P.2d 1152 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1984)
Lee v. GNLV CORP.
996 P.2d 416 (Nevada Supreme Court, 2000)
Consolidated Generator-Nevada, Inc. v. Cummins Engine Co.
971 P.2d 1251 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Sharma Vs. Patel, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sharma-vs-patel-nev-2019.