Sharkey Vs. Stapleton
This text of Sharkey Vs. Stapleton (Sharkey Vs. Stapleton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
JAMES THEODORE SHARKEY, No. 79413 Appellant, vs. ANDREA STAPLETON, Respondent. FILED AUG 2 3 2019
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL By DE -.1( CLERK
This is a pro se appeal from an order denying appellant's motion to inspect all evidence favorable to him. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; William D. Kephart, Judge. Review of the documents submitted to this court pursuant to NRAP 3(g) reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, the judgment or order designated in the notice of appeal is not substantively appealable. See NRAP 3A(b). No statute or court rule provides for an appeal from an order denying a motion to inspect favorable evidence. This court has jurisdiction to consider an appeal only when the appeal is authorized by statute or court rule. Taylor Constr. Co. v. Hilton Hotels, 100 Nev. 207, 678 P.2d 1152 (1984). Accordingly, as this court lacks jurisdiction, this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
/ &e-Retto1 7J- Hardesty
Al;usbau.0 ILL:44,A) , J. J. Stiglich Silver
SUPREME COURT OF WMOA
(0) 1947A viligNa fq-3s1r0 1
cc: Hon. William D. Kephart, District Judge James Theodore Sharkey D.R. Patti & Associates Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Sharkey Vs. Stapleton, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sharkey-vs-stapleton-nev-2019.