Sharkey Issaquena Cmty. Hosp. v. Anderson

248 So. 3d 822
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 30, 2018
DocketNo. 2014–IA–00465–SCT
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 248 So. 3d 822 (Sharkey Issaquena Cmty. Hosp. v. Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sharkey Issaquena Cmty. Hosp. v. Anderson, 248 So. 3d 822 (Mich. 2018).

Opinion

MICHAEL K. RANDOLPH, PRESIDING JUSTICE, FOR THE COURT

¶ 1. The motion for rehearing filed by the Appellant is granted. The previous opinions are withdrawn and this order is substituted therefor.

¶ 2. The Court was divided equally four-four. Consequently, the judgment of the *823Circuit Court of Sharkey County should have been affirmed for this reason. See Durant v. Essex Co. , 74 U.S. (7 Wall.) 107, 19 L.Ed. 154 (1868) ; Hertz v. Woodman , 218 U.S. 205, 206, 30 S.Ct. 621, 621, 54 L.Ed. 1001 (1910) ; Pascagoula Nat'l Bank v. Barq , 23 So.2d 530, 530 (Miss. 1945) ; Hawkins v. Cmty. Bank of Raymore , --- U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 1072, 194 L.Ed. 2d 163, reh'g denied , --- U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 2534, 195 L.Ed. 2d 860 (2016).

¶ 3. Accordingly, we remand this case for further proceedings.

SO ORDERED.

NOT PARTICIPATING: MAXWELL, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Julio Gordon v. Christy Dickerson
Mississippi Supreme Court, 2022

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
248 So. 3d 822, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sharkey-issaquena-cmty-hosp-v-anderson-miss-2018.