Sharkey Issaquena Cmty. Hosp. v. Anderson

248 So. 3d 822
Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided January 30, 2018·No. No. 2014–IA–00465–SCT·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

MICHAEL K. RANDOLPH, PRESIDING JUSTICE, FOR THE COURT

¶ 1. The motion for rehearing filed by the Appellant is granted. The previous opinions are withdrawn and this order is substituted therefor.

¶ 2. The Court was divided equally four-four. Consequently, the judgment of the *823Circuit Court of Sharkey County should have been affirmed for this reason. See Durant v. Essex Co. , 74 U.S. (7 Wall.) 107, 19 L.Ed. 154 (1868) ; Hertz v. Woodman , 218 U.S. 205, 206, 30 S.Ct. 621, 621, 54 L.Ed. 1001 (1910) ; Pascagoula Nat'l Bank v. Barq , 23 So.2d 530, 530 (Miss. 1945) ; Hawkins v. Cmty. Bank of Raymore , --- U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 1072, 194 L.Ed. 2d 163, reh'g denied , --- U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 2534, 195 L.Ed. 2d 860 (2016).

¶ 3. Accordingly, we remand this case for further proceedings.

SO ORDERED.

NOT PARTICIPATING: MAXWELL, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sharkey Issaquena Cmty. Hosp. v. Anderson, 248 So. 3d 822 (Mich. 2018).

248 So. 3d 822 (Sharkey Issaquena Cmty. Hosp. v. Anderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Julio Gordon v. Christy Dickerson
Mississippi Supreme Court, 2022