Sharifullah v. Bush
This text of Sharifullah v. Bush (Sharifullah v. Bush) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
_____________________________ ) SHARIFULLAH, et.al., ) ) Petitioners, ) ) ) Civ. No. 08-1222 (EGS) v. ) ) GEORGE W. BUSH, et al., ) ) Respondents. ) _____________________________ )
ORDER
Pursuant to the status hearing held on February 6, 2009, it
is hereby:
ORDERED that by no later than February 17, 2009, the
government shall produce to Petitioner’s counsel, subject to any
restrictions pursuant to the Protective Order in this case, any
and all exculpatory information reasonably available to the
United States Government that bears on Petitioner’s detention
and/or that would suggest that Petitioner should not be
designated as an enemy combatant. It is further
government shall produce all information reasonably available to
the United States Government bearing on the circumstances
surrounding any statements upon which Respondent relies in its
Factual Return. (See Parhat v. Gates, 532 F.3d 834, 847 (“As the
Supreme Court explained in Concrete Pipe, in the course of discussing the nature of “‘the burden of showing something ‘by a
preponderance of the evidence’”: ‘Before any such burden can be
satisfied in the first instance, the factfinder must evaluate the
raw evidence, finding it to be sufficiently reliable and
sufficiently probative to demonstrate the truth of the asserted
proposition with the requisite degree of certainty.’”) (citing
Concrete Pipe & Prods., Inc. V. Construction Laborers Pension
Trust, 508 U.S. 602 (1993)). See also Haynes v. Washington, 373
U.S. 503, 513 (1963) (“‘In short, the true test of admissibility
is that the confession is made freely, voluntarily, and without
compulsion or inducement of any sort.’” ... And, of course,
whether the confession was obtained by coercion or improper
inducement can be determined only by an examination of all the
attendant circumstances.”) (internal citations omitted). It is
further
ORDERED that by no later than February 13, 2009, the
government shall file an unclassified version of the Factual
Return. It is further
ORDERED that by no later than 12:00 p.m. on March 2, 2009,
Petitioner shall file with the Court a pleading setting forth the
need for any additional discovery.
ORDERED that the parties shall file a Status Report by no
later than 12:00 p.m. on March 13, 2009. It is further
ORDERED that a Status Hearing is scheduled for March 17,
2 2009, at 11:00 a.m.
SO ORDERED.
SIGNED: Emmet G. Sullivan United States District Judge February 10, 2009
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Sharifullah v. Bush, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sharifullah-v-bush-dcd-2009.