Sharif v. Masterton

Fourth Circuit

Sharif v. Masterton

448 F. App'x 386

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 4, 2011·No. No. 11-1585·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Annette Sharif appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil complaint without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i), (ii) (2006), and a subsequent order denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sharif v. Masterton, No. 3:11-cv-00160-JRS (E.D. Va. April 19, 2011; May 17, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be[387]*387fore the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Annette Sharif appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil complaint without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i), (ii) (2006), and a subsequent order denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sharif v. Masterton, No. 3:11-cv-00160-JRS (E.D. Va. April 19, 2011; May 17, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be[387]*387fore the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Sharif v. Masterton, 448 F. App'x 386 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

448 F. App'x 386 (Sharif v. Masterton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related