Sharif v. Alford

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Sharif v. Alford

631 So. 2d 1141, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 1216, 1994 WL 47123

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 18, 1994·No. No. 92-3686·Published

Opinion

BARFIELD, Judge.

The record demonstrates that the appellant filed a document entitled “Answer for Definite Statement” which appellees admitted was responsive to their motion for a more definite statement.' Th§ trial court therefore [1142]*1142erred in striking appellant’s pleadings and dismissing the complaint with prejudice for failing to file a more definite statement.

REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings.

ERVIN and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BARFIELD, Judge.

The record demonstrates that the appellant filed a document entitled “Answer for Definite Statement” which appellees admitted was responsive to their motion for a more definite statement.' Th§ trial court therefore [1142]*1142erred in striking appellant’s pleadings and dismissing the complaint with prejudice for failing to file a more definite statement.

REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings.

ERVIN and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Sharif v. Alford, 631 So. 2d 1141, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 1216, 1994 WL 47123 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

631 So. 2d 1141 (Sharif v. Alford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.