Sharif Choudhury, Tahera Chowdhury and Enterprise Houston, Inc., Rajinder Singh and Rita Kaur, Rajiv Chhabra and Gauri Chhabra v. Slawomir J. Skibicki and a & Skipol, Inc., a Texas Corporation

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 11, 2014
Docket01-14-00825-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Sharif Choudhury, Tahera Chowdhury and Enterprise Houston, Inc., Rajinder Singh and Rita Kaur, Rajiv Chhabra and Gauri Chhabra v. Slawomir J. Skibicki and a & Skipol, Inc., a Texas Corporation (Sharif Choudhury, Tahera Chowdhury and Enterprise Houston, Inc., Rajinder Singh and Rita Kaur, Rajiv Chhabra and Gauri Chhabra v. Slawomir J. Skibicki and a & Skipol, Inc., a Texas Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sharif Choudhury, Tahera Chowdhury and Enterprise Houston, Inc., Rajinder Singh and Rita Kaur, Rajiv Chhabra and Gauri Chhabra v. Slawomir J. Skibicki and a & Skipol, Inc., a Texas Corporation, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

Order issued December 11, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-14-00825-CV ——————————— SHARIF CHOUDHURY, TAHERA CHOWDHURY, AND ENTERPRISE HOUSTON, INC., RAJINDER SINGH, RITA KAUR, RAJIV CHHABRA, AND GAURI CHHABRA, Appellants V. SLAWOMIR J. SKIBICKI AND A & SKIPOL, INC., Appellees

On Appeal from the 11th Judicial District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2013-76488

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Appellants, Sharif Choudhury, Tahera Chowdhury, and Enterprise Houston,

Inc., have filed a motion to voluntarily dismiss their appeal and request that all

costs be assessed against the party incurring the same. Appellants state that appellees have been contacted and do not oppose this motion and that this

dismissal will not prevent any other parties from seeking relief to which they

would otherwise be entitled. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.3(a)(2), 42.1(a)(1). Although

other parties have filed their own notices of appeal, no opinion has issued

involving the above appellants. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), (c).

Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal by Sharif

Choudhury, Tahera Chowdhury, and Enterprise Houston, Inc., with costs to be

taxed against the party who incurred the same. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), (b),

(d), 43.2(f). We dismiss any pending motions by the above appellants as moot.

The appeal by the remaining appellants remains on this Court’s active docket.

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Higley, and Brown.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Sharif Choudhury, Tahera Chowdhury and Enterprise Houston, Inc., Rajinder Singh and Rita Kaur, Rajiv Chhabra and Gauri Chhabra v. Slawomir J. Skibicki and a & Skipol, Inc., a Texas Corporation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sharif-choudhury-tahera-chowdhury-and-enterprise-houston-inc-rajinder-texapp-2014.