Sharif Choudhury, Tahera Chowdhury and Enterprise Houston, Inc., Rajinder Singh and Rita Kaur, Rajiv Chhabra and Gauri Chhabra v. Slawomir J. Skibicki and a & Skipol, Inc., a Texas Corporation
This text of Sharif Choudhury, Tahera Chowdhury and Enterprise Houston, Inc., Rajinder Singh and Rita Kaur, Rajiv Chhabra and Gauri Chhabra v. Slawomir J. Skibicki and a & Skipol, Inc., a Texas Corporation (Sharif Choudhury, Tahera Chowdhury and Enterprise Houston, Inc., Rajinder Singh and Rita Kaur, Rajiv Chhabra and Gauri Chhabra v. Slawomir J. Skibicki and a & Skipol, Inc., a Texas Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order issued December 11, 2014
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-14-00825-CV ——————————— SHARIF CHOUDHURY, TAHERA CHOWDHURY, AND ENTERPRISE HOUSTON, INC., RAJINDER SINGH, RITA KAUR, RAJIV CHHABRA, AND GAURI CHHABRA, Appellants V. SLAWOMIR J. SKIBICKI AND A & SKIPOL, INC., Appellees
On Appeal from the 11th Judicial District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2013-76488
MEMORANDUM ORDER
Appellants, Sharif Choudhury, Tahera Chowdhury, and Enterprise Houston,
Inc., have filed a motion to voluntarily dismiss their appeal and request that all
costs be assessed against the party incurring the same. Appellants state that appellees have been contacted and do not oppose this motion and that this
dismissal will not prevent any other parties from seeking relief to which they
would otherwise be entitled. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.3(a)(2), 42.1(a)(1). Although
other parties have filed their own notices of appeal, no opinion has issued
involving the above appellants. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), (c).
Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal by Sharif
Choudhury, Tahera Chowdhury, and Enterprise Houston, Inc., with costs to be
taxed against the party who incurred the same. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), (b),
(d), 43.2(f). We dismiss any pending motions by the above appellants as moot.
The appeal by the remaining appellants remains on this Court’s active docket.
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Higley, and Brown.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Sharif Choudhury, Tahera Chowdhury and Enterprise Houston, Inc., Rajinder Singh and Rita Kaur, Rajiv Chhabra and Gauri Chhabra v. Slawomir J. Skibicki and a & Skipol, Inc., a Texas Corporation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sharif-choudhury-tahera-chowdhury-and-enterprise-houston-inc-rajinder-texapp-2014.