Sharief v. Leonardo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sharief v. Leonardo

186 A.D.2d 932, 589 N.Y.S.2d 823, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12361

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 29, 1992

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 186 A.D.2d 932 (Sharief v. Leonardo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sharief v. Leonardo, 186 A.D.2d 932, 589 N.Y.S.2d 823, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12361 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

— Proceeding' pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Washington County) to review a determination of respondent Superintendent of Great Meadow Correctional Facility which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

The Attorney-General advised this Court that respondents would not be submitting a brief and have submitted administrative memoranda indicating that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed and expunged from petitioner’s record. Inasmuch as the initial determination has been administratively reversed, the controversy has ended and respondents’ motion to dismiss should be granted (see, Matter of Wong v Coughlin, 150 AD2d 832).

Mikoll, J. P., Crew III, Mahoney, Casey and Harvey, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Proceeding' pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Washington County) to review a determination of respondent Superintendent of Great Meadow Correctional Facility which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

The Attorney-General advised this Court that respondents would not be submitting a brief and have submitted administrative memoranda indicating that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed and expunged from petitioner’s record. Inasmuch as the initial determination has been administratively reversed, the controversy has ended and respondents’ motion to dismiss should be granted (see, Matter of Wong v Coughlin, 150 AD2d 832).

Mikoll, J. P., Crew III, Mahoney, Casey and Harvey, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

186 A.D.2d 932, 589 N.Y.S.2d 823, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12361, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sharief-v-leonardo-nyappdiv-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack