Shari Thigpen v. Citibank, N.A.
This text of Shari Thigpen v. Citibank, N.A. (Shari Thigpen v. Citibank, N.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. New Mexico primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
SHARI THIGPEN,
Plaintiff,
vs. No. 25cv0622 KG/JMR
CITIBANK, N.A.,
Defendant.
ORDER OF REFERENCE
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(1)(B), (b)(3), and Va. Beach Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n v. Wood, 901 F.2d 849 (10th Cir. 1990), this matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Jennifer M. Rozzoni to conduct hearings, if warranted, including evidentiary hearings, and to perform any legal analysis required to recommend to the Court an ultimate disposition of the case. The Magistrate Judge will submit an analysis, including findings of fact, if necessary, and recommended disposition, to the District Judge assigned to the case, with copies provided to the parties. The parties will be given the opportunity to object to the proposed findings, analysis, and disposition as described in 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Objections must be filed within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy of the proposed disposition. /s/Kenneth J. Gonzales___________________ CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
• Please note that this document has been electronically filed. To verify its authenticity, please refer to the Digital File Stamp on the NEF (Notice of Electronic Filing) accompanying this document. Electronically filed documents can be found on the Court’s PACER public access system.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Shari Thigpen v. Citibank, N.A., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shari-thigpen-v-citibank-na-nmd-2025.