Sharer v. Dobbins

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Sharer v. Dobbins

45 A. 660, 195 Pa. 82, 1900 Pa. LEXIS 587

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedFebruary 26, 1900

DocketAppeal, No. 389

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 45 A. 660 (Sharer v. Dobbins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sharer v. Dobbins, 45 A. 660, 195 Pa. 82, 1900 Pa. LEXIS 587 (Pa. 1900).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The assignments of error are based on an excerpt from the charge, and on the answers to the defendant’s first and third points. The excerpt must be considered in connection with other parts of the charge relating to the claims of the parties and the evidence applicable to thexn. So considered we regard the excerpt as unobjectionable. The answers to the defendant’s points are in harmony with the charge^ and we cannot find in either o£ them any cause for reversing the judgment. The assignments are overruled.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

The assignments of error are based on an excerpt from the charge, and on the answers to the defendant’s first and third points. The excerpt must be considered in connection with other parts of the charge relating to the claims of the parties and the evidence applicable to thexn. So considered we regard the excerpt as unobjectionable. The answers to the defendant’s points are in harmony with the charge^ and we cannot find in either o£ them any cause for reversing the judgment. The assignments are overruled.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

45 A. 660, 195 Pa. 82, 1900 Pa. LEXIS 587, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sharer-v-dobbins-pa-1900.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack