Share v. Lytle
16 Serg. & Rawle 9, 1827 Pa. LEXIS 22
Opinion
The first day of the term was intended to mean the actual sitting of the court, and this much has been decided; but it is impossible, without violating the law, to carry the construction further. We consider the matter as settled, and therefore direct the appeal to be quashed.
Appeal quashed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Share v. Lytle, 16 Serg. & Rawle 9, 1827 Pa. LEXIS 22 (Pa. 1827).
16 Serg. & Rawle 9 (Share v. Lytle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Case of Kreider's Estate
3 Rawle 205 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1832)