Share v. Lytle
16 Serg. & Rawle 9, 1827 Pa. LEXIS 22
This text of 16 Serg. & Rawle 9 (Share v. Lytle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Share v. Lytle, 16 Serg. & Rawle 9, 1827 Pa. LEXIS 22 (Pa. 1827).
Opinion
The first day of the term was intended to mean the actual sitting of the court, and this much has been decided; but it is impossible, without violating the law, to carry the construction further. We consider the matter as settled, and therefore direct the appeal to be quashed.
Appeal quashed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Case of Kreider's Estate
3 Rawle 205 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1832)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
16 Serg. & Rawle 9, 1827 Pa. LEXIS 22, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/share-v-lytle-pa-1827.