Sharapata v. Town of Islip

68 A.D.2d 925, 414 N.Y.S.2d 374, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11178
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Sharapata v. Town of Islip. Read the opinion of the Court — 82 A.D.2d 350

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated August 21, 1978, which directed it to produce for discovery and inspection certain documents including communications which were made prior to the happening of the accident in question. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. Special Term correctly held that communications which preceded the happening of the accident do not constitute "Material prepared for litigation” within the purview of CPLR 3101 (subd [d], par 2) (see Abrams v Vaughan & Bushnell Mfg. Co., 37 AD2d 833; Bennett v Troy [926]*926Record Co., 25 AD2d 799; 3A Weinstein-Korn-Miller, NY Civ Prac, par 3101.51). Defendant’s other contentions are also without merit. Titone, J. P., Shapiro, Margett and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sharapata v. Town of Islip, 68 A.D.2d 925, 414 N.Y.S.2d 374, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11178 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

68 A.D.2d 925 (Sharapata v. Town of Islip) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bennett v. Troy Record Co.
25 A.D.2d 799 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1966)
Abrams v. Vaughan & Bushnell Mfg. Co.
37 A.D.2d 833 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1971)