Shapiro v. Stiles

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-2278

JOSHUA BARRETT SHAPIRO,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

MARK DOUGLAS STILES, City Attorney, Office of the City Attorney of Virginia Beach,

Defendant – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, District Judge. (2:09-cv-00344-MSD-FBS)

Submitted: July 22, 2010 Decided: July 29, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joshua Barrett Shapiro, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Joshua Barrett Shapiro appeals the district court’s

order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28

U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. See Shapiro v. Stiles,

No. 2:09-cv-00344-MSD-FBS (E.D. Va. Oct. 30, 2009). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED