Shapiro v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Shapiro v. State

264 A.D. 978

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 30, 1942

DocketClaim No. 23622

StatusPublished

This text of 264 A.D. 978 (Shapiro v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shapiro v. State, 264 A.D. 978 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

The judgment herein is modified by adding to it the sum of $638.64, arising out of the nailing strip claim, and the sum of $602.40, arising out of the steel trim opening claim, with interest thereon as requested in appellant’s Conclusion of Law; and, as amended, is affirmed with costs to the appellant. The court reverses Findings of Fact required in the State’s requests to find, as follows: Findings of Fact 8, 10, 11, 12 and 15, and Conclusion of Law 1. The court makes the additional Findings of Fact, as contained in the appellant’s requests to find, as follows: Findings of Fact 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, and the Conclusions of Law in the appellant’s requests to find. Hill, P. J., Crapser, Bliss and Hefíernan, JJ., concur; Schenek, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The judgment herein is modified by adding to it the sum of $638.64, arising out of the nailing strip claim, and the sum of $602.40, arising out of the steel trim opening claim, with interest thereon as requested in appellant’s Conclusion of Law; and, as amended, is affirmed with costs to the appellant. The court reverses Findings of Fact required in the State’s requests to find, as follows: Findings of Fact 8, 10, 11, 12 and 15, and Conclusion of Law 1. The court makes the additional Findings of Fact, as contained in the appellant’s requests to find, as follows: Findings of Fact 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, and the Conclusions of Law in the appellant’s requests to find. Hill, P. J., Crapser, Bliss and Hefíernan, JJ., concur; Schenek, J., dissents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

264 A.D. 978, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shapiro-v-state-nyappdiv-1942.