Shapiro v. Shapiro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Shapiro v. Shapiro

49 A.D.2d 520, 373 N.Y.S.2d 844, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10361

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 1, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 49 A.D.2d 520 (Shapiro v. Shapiro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shapiro v. Shapiro, 49 A.D.2d 520, 373 N.Y.S.2d 844, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10361 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment entered in the Supreme Court, New York County, on December 10, 1974, inter alia, directing defendant-appellant to pay the sum of $325 per week for the support of the parties’ two infant children, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, so as to reduce the support payments to the sum of $250 per week and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Under the circumstances and the evidence in this record, and taking into consideration the needs of the two children and appellant’s present earnings and his financial resources, we find the award excessive to the extent indicated. Concur— Kupferman, J. P., Lupiano, Capozzoli, Nunez and Lynch, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment entered in the Supreme Court, New York County, on December 10, 1974, inter alia, directing defendant-appellant to pay the sum of $325 per week for the support of the parties’ two infant children, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, so as to reduce the support payments to the sum of $250 per week and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Under the circumstances and the evidence in this record, and taking into consideration the needs of the two children and appellant’s present earnings and his financial resources, we find the award excessive to the extent indicated. Concur— Kupferman, J. P., Lupiano, Capozzoli, Nunez and Lynch, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

49 A.D.2d 520, 373 N.Y.S.2d 844, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10361, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shapiro-v-shapiro-nyappdiv-1975.