Shapiro v. Shapiro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Shapiro v. Shapiro

250 A.D. 882, 295 N.Y.S. 100, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9553

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 30, 1937

StatusPublished

This text of 250 A.D. 882 (Shapiro v. Shapiro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shapiro v. Shapiro, 250 A.D. 882, 295 N.Y.S. 100, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9553 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

The proof shows defendant was financially able to comply with the directions of the orders directing him to pay alimony and was, therefore, in contempt of court for failure to pay the sum of $1,014, the amount of the arrears at the time of the application to punish for contempt. Order denying motion to punish for contempt reversed on the la.w and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted; defendant fined the sum of $1,014, with the right to purge himself of contempt by paying the sum of ten dollars per week- beginning [883]*883May 7, 1937, in addition to the regular alimony. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Davis, Johnston and Taylor, JJ., concur. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The proof shows defendant was financially able to comply with the directions of the orders directing him to pay alimony and was, therefore, in contempt of court for failure to pay the sum of $1,014, the amount of the arrears at the time of the application to punish for contempt. Order denying motion to punish for contempt reversed on the la.w and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted; defendant fined the sum of $1,014, with the right to purge himself of contempt by paying the sum of ten dollars per week- beginning [883]*883May 7, 1937, in addition to the regular alimony. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Davis, Johnston and Taylor, JJ., concur. Settle order on notice.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

250 A.D. 882, 295 N.Y.S. 100, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9553, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shapiro-v-shapiro-nyappdiv-1937.