Shapiro v. Shapiro

670 So. 2d 1177, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3332, 1996 WL 148873
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 3, 1996
DocketNos. 94-3265, 94-3609
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 670 So. 2d 1177 (Shapiro v. Shapiro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shapiro v. Shapiro, 670 So. 2d 1177, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3332, 1996 WL 148873 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Because of irregularities evident in the record, we reverse the amended final judgment on former wife’s motion for contempt and the final judgment awarding attorney’s fees to former wife. On remand, the successor judge shall conduct a de novo trial of the issues raised in the motion for contempt. The trial judge should then reconsider applications for trial and appellate attorney’s fees under the marital settlement agreement or Chapter 61, Florida Statutes (1995).

KLEIN, PARIENTE and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Flint v. Fortson
744 So. 2d 1217 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
670 So. 2d 1177, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3332, 1996 WL 148873, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shapiro-v-shapiro-fladistctapp-1996.