Shapiro v. Shapiro
670 So. 2d 1177, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3332, 1996 WL 148873
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 3, 1996·No. Nos. 94-3265, 94-3609·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Because of irregularities evident in the record, we reverse the amended final judgment on former wife’s motion for contempt and the final judgment awarding attorney’s fees to former wife. On remand, the successor judge shall conduct a de novo trial of the issues raised in the motion for contempt. The trial judge should then reconsider applications for trial and appellate attorney’s fees under the marital settlement agreement or Chapter 61, Florida Statutes (1995).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Shapiro v. Shapiro, 670 So. 2d 1177, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3332, 1996 WL 148873 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).
670 So. 2d 1177 (Shapiro v. Shapiro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Flint v. Fortson
744 So. 2d 1217 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)