Shapiro v. Sealy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Shapiro v. Sealy

210 A.D. 861

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 15, 1924

StatusPublished

This text of 210 A.D. 861 (Shapiro v. Sealy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shapiro v. Sealy, 210 A.D. 861 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

Order reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. The witnesses all reside in the county of Bronx, New York city, the defendant in the city of New York, where the plaintiff is engaged in business, and where the agreement for the sale of the property was made. (Brady v. Hogan, 117 App. Div. 898; Turner v. Constantine, 190 id. 958.) No opinion. Kelly, P. J., Rich, Jaycox, Manning and Kelby, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. The witnesses all reside in the county of Bronx, New York city, the defendant in the city of New York, where the plaintiff is engaged in business, and where the agreement for the sale of the property was made. (Brady v. Hogan, 117 App. Div. 898; Turner v. Constantine, 190 id. 958.) No opinion. Kelly, P. J., Rich, Jaycox, Manning and Kelby, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

210 A.D. 861, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shapiro-v-sealy-nyappdiv-1924.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack