Shapiro v. Sealy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Shapiro v. Sealy

210 A.D. 861

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 15, 1924·Published

Opinion

Order reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. The witnesses all reside in the county of Bronx, New York city, the defendant in the city of New York, where the plaintiff is engaged in business, and where the agreement for the sale of the property was made. (Brady v. Hogan, 117 App. Div. 898; Turner v. Constantine, 190 id. 958.) No opinion. Kelly, P. J., Rich, Jaycox, Manning and Kelby, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. The witnesses all reside in the county of Bronx, New York city, the defendant in the city of New York, where the plaintiff is engaged in business, and where the agreement for the sale of the property was made. (Brady v. Hogan, 117 App. Div. 898; Turner v. Constantine, 190 id. 958.) No opinion. Kelly, P. J., Rich, Jaycox, Manning and Kelby, JJ., concur.

Shapiro v. Sealy, 210 A.D. 861 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1924).

Pincite

210 A.D. 861 (Shapiro v. Sealy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related