Shapiro v. Rothschild Development, Ltd.
This text of 964 S.W.2d 852 (Shapiro v. Rothschild Development, Ltd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Plaintiff appeals from the entry of summary judgment in favor of defendant in plaintiff’s suit against his landlord for personal injuries sustained as a result of a criminal robbery and assault by third parties occurring on a parking lot owned by the landlord and made available for use by tenants. The facts were undisputed and the issue presented is solely one of law. No error of law appears and the summary judgment was properly granted. Kopoian v. George Miller & Co., Inc., 901 S.W.2d 63 (Mo.App.1995). An opinion would serve no precedential purpose. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
964 S.W.2d 852, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 315, 1998 WL 72848, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shapiro-v-rothschild-development-ltd-moctapp-1998.