Shapiro v. Rosenthal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Shapiro v. Rosenthal

171 A.D. 939

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 15, 1915

StatusPublished

This text of 171 A.D. 939 (Shapiro v. Rosenthal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shapiro v. Rosenthal, 171 A.D. 939 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

We think upon this evidence the court was required to submit the question as to the defendant’s liability to the jury. The judgment is, therefore, reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Scott and Dowling, JJ.; Ingraham, P. J., and Dowling, J., dissented and voted to affirm. Judgment reversed, new trial ordered, costs to appellant to abide event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

We think upon this evidence the court was required to submit the question as to the defendant’s liability to the jury. The judgment is, therefore, reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Scott and Dowling, JJ.; Ingraham, P. J., and Dowling, J., dissented and voted to affirm. Judgment reversed, new trial ordered, costs to appellant to abide event.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

171 A.D. 939, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shapiro-v-rosenthal-nyappdiv-1915.