Shapiro v. Press Publishing Co.

235 A.D. 698
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 15, 1932·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Order denying motion for judgment on the pleadings affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. We are passing upon a question of pleading only. The complaint alleges communication of the plan to defendant for a consideration to be paid if accepted. The plan or idea, if novel and of value, was sufficient consideration if there was an agreement to pay. (Keller v. American Chain Co., Inc., 255 N. Y. 94; Haskins v. Ryan, 75 N. J. Eq. 330, 332; Cobb v. Cowdery, 40 Vt. 25.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shapiro v. Press Publishing Co., 235 A.D. 698 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

235 A.D. 698 (Shapiro v. Press Publishing Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brunner v. Stix, Baer & Fuller Co.
181 S.W.2d 643 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1944)
Singer v. Karron
162 Misc. 809 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1937)
Shapiro v. Press Publishing Co.
246 A.D. 826 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1936)