Shapiro v. Nulife Garments Co.

270 A.D. 121, 58 N.Y.S.2d 399
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 16, 1945·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Before granting a declaratory judgment the court must be convinced it will serve some practical purpose by disposing of real controversies and stabilizing disputed legal relations (Wardrop Co., Inc., v. Fairfield Gardens, Inc., 237 App. Div. 605). From the allegations of this complaint, it is impossible to determine whether what plaintiffs call “ ladies ’ girdles ” will when designed, fashioned and manufactured by plaintiffs come within the category of “ special belts ” or health belts ” prohibited by the contract. The complaint presents no defined issue or real controversy.

The order denying defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint should be reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements, and the motion granted.

Martin, P. J., Townley, Glbnnon, Dore and Cohn, JJ., concur.

Order unanimously reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant, and the motion granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shapiro v. Nulife Garments Co., 270 A.D. 121, 58 N.Y.S.2d 399 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1945).

270 A.D. 121 (Shapiro v. Nulife Garments Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Zizzo v. Zizzo
41 Misc. 2d 928 (New York Supreme Court, 1964)
Gross v. Gross
31 Misc. 2d 934 (New York Supreme Court, 1961)
Automatic Bedding Corp. v. Ortner
12 Misc. 2d 1004 (New York Supreme Court, 1958)
Merchants Mutual Casualty Co. v. Mayfield
13 Misc. 2d 381 (New York Supreme Court, 1958)
Wheeler v. Wheeler
192 Misc. 773 (New York Supreme Court, 1948)
Plessdore Realty Corp. v. Fasano
188 Misc. 975 (New York Supreme Court, 1947)