Shapiro v. Lanteigne

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 29, 2010·No. 10-1152·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1152

JOSHUA BARRETT SHAPIRO,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

PAUL LANTEIGNE,

Defendant – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, District Judge. (2:09-cv-00339-MSD-FBS)

Submitted: July 22, 2010 Decided: July 29, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joshua Barrett Shapiro, Appellant Pro Se. Jeff W. Rosen, PENDER & COWARD, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Joshua Barrett Shapiro appeals the district court’s

order granting the Defendant’s motion for summary judgment and

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See Shapiro v. Lanteigne, No. 2:09-cv-00339-MSD-FBS

(E.D. Va. Jan. 22, 2010). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shapiro v. Lanteigne, (4th Cir. 2010).

Shapiro v. Lanteigne (Shapiro v. Lanteigne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related