Shapiro v. Danzig
This text of 267 A.D. 949 (Shapiro v. Danzig) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The order appealed from embodies provisions which are not to be found in the stipulation of settlement made in open court. Terms of that agreement may not be altered subsequently without the assent of the parties.
The order should be modified by striking from the first paragraph the words “ a complete ” and substituting therefor the word “ an ” and by striking from the second decretal paragraph that portion thereof beginning with the words “ and that any issues ” and ending with the words “ except as set forth in the stipulation of settlement”, and as so modified affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements to the appellant.
Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Dore and Cohn, JJ.
Order unanimously modified by striking from the first paragraph the words “a complete” and substituting therefor the word “an” and by striking from the second decretal paragraph that portion thereof beginning with the words “ and that any issues ” and ending with the words “ except as set forth in the stipulation of settlement”, and as so modified affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements to the appellant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
267 A.D. 949, 47 N.Y.S.2d 513, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6187, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shapiro-v-danzig-nyappdiv-1944.