Shapiro v. Danzig

267 A.D. 949, 47 N.Y.S.2d 513, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6187
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 21, 1944·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The order appealed from embodies provisions which are not to be found in the stipulation of settlement made in open court. Terms of that agreement may not be altered subsequently without the assent of the parties.

The order should be modified by striking from the first paragraph the words a complete ” and substituting therefor the word “ an ” and by striking from the second decretal paragraph that portion thereof beginning with the words “ and that any issues ” and ending with the words “ except as set forth in the stipulation of settlement”, and as so modified affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements to the appellant.

Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Dore and Cohn, JJ.

Order unanimously modified by striking from the first paragraph the words “a complete” and substituting therefor the word “an” and by striking from the second decretal paragraph that portion thereof beginning with the words and that any issues ” and ending with the words “ except as set forth in the stipulation of settlement”, and as so modified affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements to the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shapiro v. Danzig, 267 A.D. 949, 47 N.Y.S.2d 513, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6187 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1944).

267 A.D. 949 (Shapiro v. Danzig) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mann v. Wasserberger
65 A.D.2d 717 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)
Marshall v. Marshall
52 A.D.2d 841 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
Vranick v. Vranick
41 A.D.2d 663 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1973)