Shapiro v. Astrue
This text of Shapiro v. Astrue (Shapiro v. Astrue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CLARA CRAWFORD, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner No. 06-55822 of Social Security Administration, D.C. No. Defendant-Appellee, CV-00-11884 (AN) BRIAN C. SHAPIRO, Real-party-in- interest-Appellant.
RUBY WASHINGTON, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner No. 06-55954 of Social Security Administration, D.C. No. Defendant-Appellee, CV-03-06884 (AN) YOUNG CHO, Real-party-in- interest-Appellant.
6565 6566 CRAWFORD v. ASTRUE
DAPHNE M. TREJO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. No. 06-56284 MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner D.C. No. of Social Security Administration, Respondent-Appellee, CV-98- 05662 (RNB) DENISE BOURGEOIS HALEY, ORDER Attorney, Real-party-in- interest-Appellant. Filed May 27, 2009
ORDER
KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit. PRINTED FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON REUTERS/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO
The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2009
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Shapiro v. Astrue, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shapiro-v-astrue-ca9-2009.