Shapiro & Ornish v. Holliday

Fifth Circuit

Shapiro & Ornish v. Holliday

37 F.2d 407, 1930 U.S. App. LEXIS 2564

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 7, 1930

Docket5557

StatusPublished

Cited by24 cases

This text of 37 F.2d 407 (Shapiro & Ornish v. Holliday) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shapiro & Ornish v. Holliday, 37 F.2d 407, 1930 U.S. App. LEXIS 2564 (5th Cir. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

FOSTER, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment denying a discharge in bankruptcy to appellants on the ground that they had failed to explain satisfactorily losses of assets and the deficiency of assets to meet their liabilities at the time of adjudication as bankrupts. Section 14b(7) Bankruptcy Act as amended by the Act of May 27, 1926 (11 USCA § 32).

This ease presents purely a question of fact. The District Court in 37 F.(2d) 403 reviewed the material facts and reached the conclusion that a discharge should be withheld. It would serve no good purpose to again review the facts. It is enough to say that the record supports the conclusion reached by the District Court.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FOSTER, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment denying a discharge in bankruptcy to appellants on the ground that they had failed to explain satisfactorily losses of assets and the deficiency of assets to meet their liabilities at the time of adjudication as bankrupts. Section 14b(7) Bankruptcy Act as amended by the Act of May 27, 1926 (11 USCA § 32).

This ease presents purely a question of fact. The District Court in 37 F.(2d) 403 reviewed the material facts and reached the conclusion that a discharge should be withheld. It would serve no good purpose to again review the facts. It is enough to say that the record supports the conclusion reached by the District Court.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

37 F.2d 407, 1930 U.S. App. LEXIS 2564, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shapiro-ornish-v-holliday-ca5-1930.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack