Shapiro Glove Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Shapiro Glove Co. v. United States

26 Cust. Ct. 428, 1951 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 524

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedMay 8, 1951

DocketNo. 55532; protests 497157-G, etc. (New York)

StatusPublished

This text of 26 Cust. Ct. 428 (Shapiro Glove Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shapiro Glove Co. v. United States, 26 Cust. Ct. 428, 1951 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 524 (cusc 1951).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise are similar in all material respects to the gloves which [429]*429were the subject of United States v. Julius Kayser & Co. (33 C. C. P. A. 179, C.A.D.333), the claim at 50 percent under paragraph 915, plus the additional duty-under paragraph 924, was sustained. Other items of the merchandise, stipulated to be similar to the knit fabric passed upon in Abstract 51342, were held dutiable at 35 percent under paragrapn 914, plus the additional duty under said paragraph 924.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise are similar in all material respects to the gloves which [429]*429were the subject of United States v. Julius Kayser & Co. (33 C. C. P. A. 179, C.A.D.333), the claim at 50 percent under paragraph 915, plus the additional duty-under paragraph 924, was sustained. Other items of the merchandise, stipulated to be similar to the knit fabric passed upon in Abstract 51342, were held dutiable at 35 percent under paragrapn 914, plus the additional duty under said paragraph 924.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

26 Cust. Ct. 428, 1951 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 524, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shapiro-glove-co-v-united-states-cusc-1951.