Shapero v. Mercede

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Shapero v. Mercede

786 A.2d 430, 258 Conn. 944, 2001 Conn. LEXIS 510

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided November 27, 2001·No. SC 16628·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 66 Conn. App. 343 (AC 21230), is granted, limited to the following issues:

[945] The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16628. Brenden P. Leydon, in support of the petition. Neal L. Moskow, in opposition. Decided November 27, 2001

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly reverse the trial court’s adoption of the referee’s report on the amount of attorney’s fees due the plaintiff?

“2. If the Appellate Court properly reversed the trial court’s adoption of the referee’s report, should the matter be remanded for a new trial?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 66 Conn. App. 343 (AC 21230), is granted, limited to the following issues:

[945] The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16628. Brenden P. Leydon, in support of the petition. Neal L. Moskow, in opposition. Decided November 27, 2001

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly reverse the trial court’s adoption of the referee’s report on the amount of attorney’s fees due the plaintiff?

“2. If the Appellate Court properly reversed the trial court’s adoption of the referee’s report, should the matter be remanded for a new trial?”

Shapero v. Mercede, 786 A.2d 430, 258 Conn. 944, 2001 Conn. LEXIS 510 (Colo. 2001).

Pincite

786 A.2d 430 (Shapero v. Mercede) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related